This blog is dedicated to logical Reasoning, political consciousness, religious dialogue, intelligent thoughts, uncommon wisdom, current events, and humor.
To say that Newt Gingrich, former Congressman and potential 2012 Presidential candidate, has lots of ideas for America is a monumental understatement.
Some of Newt’s ideas are refreshingly radical and yet suspiciously alarming at the same time. He would like to require exercise for school children, extend tax breaks to grocery stores that open in the inner city, give bonuses to food stamp recipients who buy fruits and vegetables, make students walk to school if they live close enough, and lots more. → source
Wow, for a die-hard Republican, he certainly walks a thin tight rope of socialism. Government mandates? Really? I wonder what Boss Limbaugh thinks of all this. Gee, I sure hope Newt doesn’t have to apologize!
Anyway, Newt has a fabulously unbelievable – and to some extent deliciously unthinkable – idea for reforming health care. He believes it’s time to consider paying teenage girls not to get pregnant. → same source as above
Yes, you read right! Pay teenagers to not get pregnant. Ironically, his plan does not include paying teenagers to not have sex. That would be too logical – and admittedly difficult to verify without a chastity belt. Just pay them for not getting pregnant . . . while they inevitably engage in sex.
Forgive my ignorance, but isn’t that what Republicans typify as socialism? Isn’t it an example of government hand-out? Can it not be construed as a type of affirmative action? Doesn’t it circumvent personal responsibility without incentivising by the government? Will it require a bail-out at the end?
Newt also believes that states should consider paying teenage girls who become pregnant to take prenatal vitamins to forestall paying additional health expenses for neonatal care down the road. → same source as above
Pay careful attention to the above paragraph: states should consider . . . Some one please leave me a comment and explain conservatism idea of less government to me. How do we the people end up with less government in our lives if, at the end, we shift regulations and mandates from the federal government to the states?
OK readers, I hope you’re depressed today. I truly hope that you’re in desperate need of a good laugh because I’m about to cheer you up. Get ready to laugh.
John H. Hinderaker is a lawyer and a conservative blogger at the Power Line weblog. In a recent post titled “The Importance of Being Careful“, Mr. Hinderaker felt compelled to provide President Elect Obama some free advice. Read the following excerpt for yourself and enjoy the irony.
Obama thinks he is a good talker, but he is often undisciplined when he speaks. He needs to understand that as President, his words will be scrutinized and will have impact whether he intends it or not. In this regard, President Bush is an excellent model; Obama should take a lesson from his example. Bush never gets sloppy when he is speaking publicly. He chooses his words with care and precision, which is why his style sometimes seems halting. In the eight years he has been President, it is remarkable how few gaffes or verbal blunders he has committed. If Obama doesn’t raise his standards, he will exceed Bush’s total before he is inaugurated.
I will now pause for a moment and allow you to pull yourselves together. Wipe those tears of laughter off your face.
You must be joking Mr. Hinderaker. President Bush is neither a skilled speaker nor a thoughtful one. Even many Republicans admit that much. To label George Bush as a dynamic and ‘precision’ speaker instantly reveals your own blind partisan and one-sided views.
Please allow me to assist you, Mr. Hinderaker, with presenting your case. Perhaps the message you really meant to convey was that Obama is a skilled speaker, but his message is void of meaning and substance. I’m positive that is the idea you attempted to communicate. However, you presented this thesis in the context of comparing Obama with Bush. In that regard, all roads lead to failure. President Bush is not only a horrible speaker, he lacks the ability to formulate his thoughts in a coherent manner. And worse, he utterly lacks the ability to connect with his audience. President Bush had 8 years to study President Reagan’s style and to learn from it. Bush failed.
Here’s one small sample in a sea of evidence that proves my point.
Joe “the plumber”. I’m so sick of still hearing about Joe the plumber. He even has a Wiki page now. Stop it people. The election is over already.
I won’t be able to forgive McCain or the Republicans for catapulting this irrelevant person and now immaterial concept into the American day-to-day conversation. The anxious Republicans, grasping at any straw in sight during the election season, latched on to Joe the plumber like stink on a monkey. They didn’t seem to care about Joe or his past. All that mattered was that Joe disagreed with Obama’s tax policy, calling it Marxist. For Joe, spreading the wealth around was not an acceptable plan.
Fair enough! But wait! Here’s some news flash the Republicans should have researched first. Joe ‘the Obama-is-a Marxist plumber’ was on welfare. Twice! How pathetic.
How’s that for spreading the wealth? Joe was and is confused. Accepting welfare from the government is spreading the wealth – my wealth, your wealth, taxpayers’ wealth. Well, I for one don’t want to spread my wealth around to anyone who doesn’t appreciate it. Joe is the first to be blacklisted. In fact, I want my portion of his welfare money back.
Hey Joe! Here’s some sound economic advice for you. If you go on welfare, you should shut the hell up. You have no right to talk about spreading the wealth. And here’s another news flash. Joe still has a tax lien of $1,200 against him in Ohio. → Source
McCain, during a rally, called Joe an American hero and his role model. Seriously? Someone should fire McCain’s campaign aids for not researching this well. Oh, wait, someone did fire his aids – the American people.
Also. Remember when McCain was looking for Joe during one of his rallies but could not find him? Well, that wasn’t Joe’s fault. He had told McCain’s aids that he’d be there between 9:00 am and 3:30 pm.
Finally, how is McCain’s approval of government bailout not wealth distribution? Defend it if you can. I dare you.
Dennis Prager, for those of you who don’t know him, is a Conservative radio talk show personality and a townhall.com columnist. At a recent appearance in Minneapolis, he made a very interesting claim. Watch this video.
In case you missed it, Prager said:
Equality, which is the primary value of the left, is a European value, not an American value . . . The French Revolution said Liberty, Fraternity, Equality. The American Revolution said Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
Wow, which country do you live in Mr. Prager?
First, the Founding Fathers of our great country were . . . European! It is no surprise, therefore, to discover that some European ideas and values have trickled into the original vision of the new country that is now the United States of America.
Second, without the concept of equality:
Sarah Palin, as a woman, could not have served along side John McCain as a VP nominee.
Barack Obama could not have run for President, much less win an election.
A fetus could not be granted the same rights as a full grown human. See my earlier post on this.
You are not to enjoy the same rights as someone who is more wealthy than you.
Much of Christianity’s teachings don’t make sense.
God is unfair in his love of humans.
Third, it’s been widely reported that a European socialist once said: “Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth, upon this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” He went on to become the first Republican-elected President!
Finally, the U.S. Constitution claims the following 2 points:
“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
Notice the order in which the “truths” are presented in the second bullet point. Equality comes first. Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness are presented after equality as unalienable rights. In other words, equality is so obvious and “self-evident” that it is not necessary to list it as a right.
Perhaps next time you feel the urge to discuss American values, Mr. Prager, you can at least study the U.S. Constitution first.
A few days ago, I wrote a post about how much I dislike receiving calls from the 2 Presidential campaigns. I absolutely abhor all the non-sense and promises they convey in these messages. I even threatened to vote for Ron Paul if they continue their stupid, boring, and monotonous robocalls.
It appears that I’m not alone in having that sentiment. Politicians are beginning to get the message, and some have finally stepped forward with alternative solutions. Case in point: Zane Starkewolf is a Republican who’s running in California’s First District. He’s a really cool guy. Not only is he a self-professed “Green Republican” (what the hell does that mean? Is he not a Red Republican?), he is a ninth-level elven warrior from Dungeons and Dragons! Wow, that’s the embodiment of coolness.
He can’t be any more cool, can he? Apparently he can. His political robocalls are the bomb. Check this out.
As a registered independent, I’m an unwilling recipient of daily assault of calls from both Presidential campaigns. I have a message for both groups:
STOP CALLING ME OR I WILL VOTE FOR RON PAUL.
Democrats call to inform me about Obama’s clean coal technology plan, and that it will create thousands of jobs. BS. Obama stole this clean coal idea from McCain. The only good thing is that they only call me once a week.
Republicans call several times a week to tell me about Bill Ayers. Stop it already! That horse is not only dead, it’s rotting. You’ve milked it for all it was worth. It’s not effective anymore, and no one (other than your own Republican base) cares.
Hasn’t anyone told both of you? Those undecided voters you’re still so fiercely targeting . . . they’ve decided already. The only undecided voters are either in insane asylums or in jail, and they can’t vote.
In August of this year, a report surfaced about Joe Biden’s net worth. Many newspapers including The Boston Globe printed the story. According to the articles, Joe Biden’s net worth is . . . not much! OpenSecrets.orgestimates Biden’s average net worth is $-52,493, which ranks him as the second least wealthy Senator. Most Democrats have presented this in a positive light and as an achievement, implying that Biden is an average ordinary ‘joe’ like the rest of the middle class folks.
Please allow me to disagree. Joe Biden is a 35 year veteran of the Senate. Yes, I understand he’s endured tragedies in his life and that he has remained a down-to-earth person. I commend him for that. However, the point is that a senior Senator with access to a tremendous amount of information and resources (that the rest of us don’t) should have been able to successfully capitalize on it without violating ethics or insider trading regulations.
Think through the logic with me. I am not alone in the belief that balancing the US budget should adhere to many of the guidelines that responsible individuals and families follow. Increasing spending in one area should correspond with either a decrease in other spending or an increase in income. All of us responsible citizens must either balance our check books at the end of the month or carry reasonable debt that is likely to be paid off in a meaningful time frame. Carrying large amounts of liability without a corresponding steady (and potential) increase in assets is not only an unsustainable long term strategy, it is downright detrimental to the stability of our families. That’s precisely the reason so many American families are in financial trouble. Under a larger umbrella, the same is true in the case of our national security and stability. Carrying unreasonable deficit endangers our country’s economic future.
Further, we should demand from our elected officials in the executive and legislative branches to remain relentless in their pursuit of creating, discovering and employing every potential opportunity to advance prosperity, education and stability of all citizens of this country. No stone should remain unturned in this endeavor. No good ideas should be spared in seeking this goal.
Here’s my issue with Biden’s net worth and those who tout this as a positive phenomenon. In any job interview, one must prove that he/she has experience in a related area, and that he/she has achieved success in implementing similar projects. For an elected official to be trusted with the country’s economic matters, there must be proof that he/she has been able to achieve personal prosperity. Having reached middle class status is insufficient. Biden’s annual salary automatically places him in the middle class.
None of us wants to live in an average America. We all want to live in an exceptional and prosperous America – a country where poverty strikes only those who are unwilling to work and strive for a better life. Who can lead the country in that direction? Only a person who has proven that he/she has achieved the same on a smaller personal scale. Biden has not proven that he can take advantage of the vast opportunities available to him as a Congressman to advance his net worth beyond the level of an average middle class individual. I am in no way implying that he should engage in shady and questionable transactions. My point is that working 35 years in one of the most powerful offices in the world naturally brings with it many opportunities: speaking engagements, books deals (which he has done), investment opportunities, etc.
I reject any argument that perhaps Biden does not have aspirations of getting wealthy. That is not the point. If you seek a job opportunity to teach others how to stay organized, you must provide proof that you are in fact an organized person yourself. If you interview for a personal trainer position, you must be a fit person yourself. If you plan to manage people’s money as a financial advisor, you must prove that you are not using food stamps for your own family.
Therefore, I conclude that Joe Biden lacks the necessary vision, drive or expertise to positively advance the country economically. I don’t believe I’m unreasonable in my expectation. If you disagree, leave me a comment.
I will begin this post just as I did my previous one about the Presidential debate last week.
I am not a Republican. I am not a Democrat. I side with Democrats on many issues. I side with Republicans on many others. I still don’t know who I’m going to vote for in November.
I am not going to evaluate any specific topics, points or responses. I’ll let others do the analysis and mudslinging. Here’s what I saw.
Sarah Palin’s game plan was to defend Palin. She had a horrible week leading to the debate. She had no choice but to make up for it. She did not disappoint. She performed spectacularly. If you read my previous post on the first Presidential debate, you know that I was impressed by Obama’s ability to address the moderator as well as McCain by looking at both of them. Palin executed the same ability perfectly by addressing the moderator and her opponent. She looked comfortable, had a smile on her face most of the time, and did not hesitate as she has in previous interviews. Biden looked as bad as McCain did – old, stiff, angry. The coaching she received in the past few days was clearly very effective. Good for her.
Joe Biden didn’t seem to have a game plan. Either he was not prepared for this debate or Palin performed so well that made Biden look bad. I have no doubt that if the format of the debate was different in a way to allow for detailed back and forth exchanges, Palin would not have performed as well. But Biden knew the format. It was his debate to lose. And he did.
Experience v.s. new blood stood out as the theme of this debate. Experience did not benefit Biden. He relied on his record in Congress, and he bet his VP nomination on the idea that the average American viewer might actually give a darn about the past or about meaningless statistics. Wrong move, Biden! Palin may not have presented many details on anything, but that was actually the right plan. We all know that VPs are virtual no-bodies. They are merely there to help the real Presidential nominee. The average American wants to hear specifics from and learn the record of Presidential nominees, not from VP nominees. I was watching CNN’s reaction meter of undecided men and women voters. Almost every time Biden talked about his record in Congress, he flat-lined the graph. No one cares. Palin achieved the same reaction when she talked about her experience as mayor and governor.
At the end, I know that VP debates are not decisive or consequential. Not much is gained or lost by them.
To say that Newt Gingrich, former Congressman and potential 2012 Presidential candidate, has lots of ideas for America is a monumental understatement.
Posted by jmjorat 
RSS Feed This Blog
